My Sarara Camp post elicited a slew of racially motivated comments when I alluded to the fact that the camp had been 'given' to the local community and top paying foreign tourists were, in some way, 'donating' to the local community by staying there. "AHHHHHH - I hear you all scream again!"
HOWEVER, I'm blocking my ears and carrying on. The truth is, (in spite of the fact that any publicity is good publicity) I really feel I have done the camp a disservice by not expressing properly what it is going on vis-a-vis them and community conservation in Northern Kenya. I apologise for that and I know that your bug-bear is not with the camp but with how I explained what they do...So I am now going to expand so that EVERYBODY understands the point that I tried putting across so clumsily in my previous post.
Yes, I am an outsider to Kenya, a foreigner, but I'm just laying it out as I see it I'm afraid. I think this further explanation is an exercise worth doing because there are amazing things going on up in Northern Kenya and very few people actually know about it.
I do ask any of the pervious 'Anonymous' nay-sayers to read this post and comment again if there are any further questions, so that together we can have a full understanding here.
Background to the Mathews Range area - a bloody history
In the early 1970s, the Mathews Range was absolutely full of game. The perfect environment for elephant and rhino among other animals such as reticulated giraffe and Grevy zebra. However, In 1977 there was a ban on legalized game hunting in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Without the infrastructure of shooting blocks and visiting hunting parties who had been paying top dollar to visit the less inhabited areas, North and East of Kenya became extremely exposed to poaching, mainly by Somali Shifta who came into Kenya in their droves to poach ivory and Rhino horn.
In less than 10 years, it is estimated that 30,000 animals were killed. Very little remained. Rhino were killed off completely, a few frightened elephant scattered and without them the landscape turned quickly to dense bush, a harsh environment for other to live in animals too. The landscape became barren and unpenetrable.
We all know that Meru and Kora National Parks were ravaged by poachers (if not, read Born Free or Born Wild by lion conservationists Joy Adamson and Tony Fitzjohn respectively).
The same problem was experienced within the Mathews Range forest eco-system except obviously this area was not a gazetted national park. Local pastoralist communities, for instance, living in and around the Mathews Range, who historically have been marginalized both politically and economically in Kenya and prone to longstanding ethnic rivalries, were terrorised, murdered; literally caught in the crossfire.
In 1989, when Ian Craig and his friend Kinyanjui were camped out on a hill right opposite what is now Sarara and by chance witnessed a whole herd of elephant being massacred by Somali poachers, they were shocked but also motivated to act. They felt that the appalling situation could not continue. The first step Ian Craig made was to encourage the local community north of his ranch Lewa to build Il Ngwesi, a community run camp which continues successfully to this day. But a larger area needed security. The Mathews Range is vast. His next idea was to set up a camp at Sarara even further north, intended as another avenue through which funding to secure this fragile area could be raised.
Nothern Rangelands Trust
Working with the Kenya Government, in 1995 The Northern Rangelands Trust was established in partnership with The Lewa Wildlife Conservancy etc. Please click on the link above, because it makes interesting reading. The NRT's role is to provide an infrastructure for local communities to communicate and ensure security in the area.
To quote their website:
The Northern Rangelands Trust has an expanding membership of Community Conservancies and encompasses over 3 million acres. It provides these communities with a forum for exchanging ideas and experiences, and is a technical, advisory and implementing organisation for its members.
Specific objectives of the Northern Rangelands Trust are:
•Ensure the conservation, management and sustainable use of the natural resources within the Trust Area;
•Promote and develop tourism and all other environmentally sustainable income-generating projects within the Trust Area;
•Promote culture, education and sports of the residents of the Trust Area;
•Promote better health of the residents of the Trust Area through the provision of better health services and facilities;
•Alleviate poverty of the inhabitants of the Trust Area through improved social services, provision of employment and establishment of community-based enterprises;
•Promote and support trusts, corporations, NGOs and other charitable organisations with similar objects to those of the Trust.
BUT - organisations like the Northern Rangelands Trust need funding. So this is where a vital place like Sarara comes in.
The Complicated bit:
Sarara Camp falls under the umbrella of the Northern Rangelands Trust (an area that now covers 3 million acres) and is located within an area called the Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust (which was initially 180,000 acres and is now 850,000 acres in size). It goes without saying that The Trust doesn't OWN this vast area land, the Trust is set up to benefit the people who already live there.
When the Namunyak Trust was set up and it was proposed that a camp might be built for tourists, whose profits would benefit the local community, there was instant distrust amongst the local community. Are white men trying to take our land? However, before setting up Sarara Camp or The Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust there were a lot of meetings with members of the local community to address this sensitivity, a lot of communication, a lot of discussion with elders. It was a long, process.
The NWCT headquarters are now located in Wamba and the trust is administered by locally elected community elders. Ian Craig and the manager of Sarara Camp are also on the committee.
It's worth pointing out here, that setting up Sarara was also a leap of faith for those who came in to build and run the camp. Which overseas tourists would want to come and pay to visit an area with no animals? However, they believed (with what appears to be blind faith) that with a new found security, the animals would return to the area. It has taken 15 years but today we can see that animals have come back - though there is still a way to go.
Securing the area
But how to ensure security in this fast tract of land?
There are now 40 scouts in the NRT area, all selected from various communities around and about. Each and every scout/ranger has undergone 6 months to 1 year of KWS training (paid for by the trust), all are allocated hand held, solar powered radios and they report back to one of 19 area HQs in case of problems, sightings of poachers etc. The HQs are all equipped with a radio room, manager's office, accomodation/housing for the scouts/rangers plus a cooking space, meeting space etc. The conservancies are grouped into regions with regional managers who oversee issues. Most of the regional co'ordinators have MA degrees - their higher eduction funded in many cases by the trust too.
The system is working
On seeing how local people were benefiting from the NWCT scheme, where the all important security was provided, health and education schemes, water initiatives - many other pastoralist communities wanted to join the Namunyak Trust too - that's why the area under the Trust auspices has grown phenomenally from a 180,000 acre to a 850,000 acres in a relatively short time. But to provide support to such a huge area also requires yet more money.
Sarara needs to raise enough funds for the rapidly growing Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust. In 2010 they raised $150,000 for the local community. I'm afraid that Il Ngwesi makes far less from tourism because the at the moment, the Sarara model is far more profitable - however all income streams are obviously a bonus for the Trust.
In tune with NRT guidelines, this is exactly how Sarara profits are split:
- Sarara Camp donates 60% of profits to a community run trust who invest the money in community development, education, healthcare, water development and a scheme whereby there is compensation available for the local population when wildlife comes into conflict with their property.
- The remaining 40% of revenue earned is earmarked for the Northern Rangelands Trust operating costs, including conservancy staff, security and infrastructure maintenance.
This is hard to swallow but in addition, having originally built Sarara Camp using personal funds in 1997, in an unprecedented move the owner/manager donated the entire lodge to the local community so the buildings, fixtures and fittings, infrastructure/water system, everything he paid for at the outset, is now wholly owned by the Samburu communities of the Namunyak Trust.
First hand feedback
I spoke to many of the Samburu who worked in and around the camp. They said that when elephant used to come and destroy their wells they would kill the elephant - not for the ivory, just in frustration for many days work destroyed. It's a different story now that the Samburu can now get compensation from the Namyunak trust or NRT - they said that there's no need for killing any more. A ranger comes and photographs or reports on the damage and then a claim is made. The wildlife/human conflict is fairly dealt with, everybody is happy.
Whereas before wildlife was a nuisance, the Samburu can see now that tourist dollars, administered by their own elders, contribute to a car for taking a sick member of their community to hospital, or to bursaries for their childrens' education, something that they would never get from their own government.
In fact the trained Samburu guides we met are absolutely proud of their wildlife, are hugely knowledgable and can read the landscape, the spoor of wild animals, the flora and fauna - with incredible insight. These guys are the ones who make the Sarara Camp experience so rich and worth paying a premium for.
Apologies for calling this charity....
I couldn't resist going to check out your original (controversial) post and comments after I read this one, as I'd not read it previously. You certainly ruffled feathers with your original blog.
ReplyDeleteI know little of Kenya and certainly aren't qualified to comment on the content of what you wrote. But I did find it interesting, as I have annoyed people on my expat blog at times with my views on the USA. I try to be honest, but not go out of my way to appear rude either. It's a bit of a minefield to be honest. If I say I prefer something American to British, I annoy the Brits, if I appear to be critical of something American, even just by appearing to not praise it enough, I can upset Americans (including my wife).
People always want you to love their country, I understand that. But the blogs where people just write how great everything is and don't have any particular subjective opinions don't particularly interest me as a reader, to be brutally frank.
I don't believe that all the opinions and ideas that I express at the time are always right, of course, some of the things I've written may well make me cringe if I read them back in a few years time - we all travel somewhere taking our personal and cultural "baggage" as well as our physical clothes and possessions.
In short I think that there is merit in "laying it out as I see it" as you say. The reader may agree or disagree, or even dislike your attitude, but it makes for more engaging writing and sometimes a vibrant discussion, it's better than being bland and at least the reader knows who you are and what you think, for better or worse.
Hi Paul,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for your comment. It made me feel MUCH better.
Often is the time I've felt, 'oh sod it, I'm going to give up blogging.' because of sour feedback, but then a few days later you dust yourself down and decide to keep going after all - which must be an indication that on some level, you think it's worth it.
It's very true; if I say Kenyan MPs are corrupt the immediate assumption by some Kenyan readers is that I am somehow implying that UK MPs are not corrupt, are above reproach and England is perfect by comparison.
Of course, we all know that this is definitely not the case. I would (and do) happily criticise UK MPs too (MP allowances scandal etc) - after all, I was brought up to question everything. Obviously there's a huge amount wrong with the UK system of government.
As you say, you can't win... but debate is always a healthy thing...
Thanks for summing it up so perfectly!!
Do keep blogging - I love your posts! As a Kenyan I do get fed up with the constant "the white people have done this against the black people etc" This whole world is now multi-racial and is never going to be Africa for the Africans, Europe for the Europeans. What is a European? White skin? I don't think so! It is someone who lives in Europe and has adopted that country as their own - just as many white people have adopted this country as their own. So let's get back to using freedom of speech and being able to express opinions without looking for something deeper.
ReplyDeleteWell done Mrs Ex-Pat wife for having the courage to speak out again all evils and highlighting the good that happens as well.
Keep blogging!
Frances
Hi,
ReplyDeleteThanks for all the posts and comments, I love the blog and actually it's been very amusing reading the back and forth on this issue. I enjoy reading about your observations and hearing your opinion, much more interesting than bland writing calculated not to offend. Not that you are offensive. I think people are often sensitive to perceived criticism from "outsiders". But this all depends on how you define insider and outsider. Are you an insider (local, Kenyan, indigenous, etc) because of blood, or birth, or because you have lived there for some time? There are big cultural differences in how insider identity is defined. Anyway, keep writing!
Juniper
Was v. interested to read in the responses to your earlier post a fellow Kenyan say that Kenyan MP's do lots for their people. I'd love to know what. And no, I'm not interested in what UK MP's do: they're not my problem.
ReplyDeleteOh wow, Please dont take the comments that personally. As a kenyan who lives in the UK, I appreciate your blog and as the previous anon said, didnt find it that abbrasive. as Aristotle said
ReplyDelete"Criticism is something you can avoid, by saying nothing, doing nothing, being nothing"
What the guys who did Sarara and other similar camps did was create a way for the local comunity to get something that their own govt couldnt provide, a share of the national 'cake' (or Ugali to avoid further criticism).
Please please keep blogging and dont expect everyone on the net to be as nice and civil as they would in person. A read down youtube comment trails will reveal to you how nasty online comments can be.
Blog on AEW
Erico
Excellent explanation of NRT, Sarara etc. I wouldn't have put in any other way. Close links with Lewa and NRT so I can confirm what you have written is an accurate representation of the project.
ReplyDeleteI’m sorry you had to go to such elaborate lengths to clear up something that was obvious in your original post. But then again, selfishly, I enjoyed reading your elaboration. There are always going to be people that argue for the sake of arguing or from a knee jerk reaction to a sensitive subject. What’s been done in Sarara camp is absolutely a donation, and a very generous one at that. Whether the person donating is white or otherwise it shouldn’t make a difference. The Samburu people in the area have been given a very important hand up that should help them for years to come, rather than a hand out that doesn’t last very long. I was lucky enough to visit a similar camp, the Elephant Bedroom Camp, last year and hope to visit the area one day again. Keep blogging…it’s my way to stay connected to Africa…the place of my birth and a country I love.
ReplyDelete''The former owner of the camp, who gave the lodge to the indigenous community in a unique and selfless gesture.''
ReplyDeleteI believe that this was what got people all riled up when commenting on your original post.
Just looking at the history of Kenya and its colonisation by the British, or any other country that has ever been colonised by foreigners for a period of time, the 'remaining' group of foreigners who remain after the fact are viewed with hostility by the ''indigenous'' people of that area. Obviously because the land was forcibly taken from them by these foreigners and they(i.e Kenyans) have had to watch on the periphery as foreigners gained from their land.
Any land (or any other thing) given back is therefore not viewed and should not be viewed as charity because the foreigners should never have had that land in their possession in the first place- whether they brought 'civilisation' or 'development' or not. There is nothing unique and selfless about living off of other peoples land while having oppressed them for decades and then later handing over some profits. It was selfish and wrong for them to have come and stolen land in the first place, secondly to have gained from that land while oppressing people, and thirdly, giving over profits out of some 'selfless' need to help the 'locals'.
It is not about people wanting you to love their country as Paul mentioned earlier, it is about rightfully acknowledging that these people should not have profited from the land in the first place. The Samburu were doing fine before the white man came- they did not need charity and hand outs then. Only after colonisation ( and in a lot of places that were colonised) do we see this 'need'. It is because they have not been able to profit from their own land because others were forcibly doing so!
That being said, and for those reasons i have mentioned above, all land owned by foreigners in Kenya from before independence and passed on down to their children need to be handed back to the Kenyan (black) people of that area. We can see the fighting that was brought about in 2007, that was mainly brought about by land issues. Right now IDPs are sitting somewhere with no land as whites from the colonial era and or their grandchildren are living on huge tracts of land, and setting up projects to help the local people as 'charity'. Is that fair? Please! Lets be real for once.
Hi Anon,
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for your explaining this issue to me. I totally understand grievances brought about by colonialism are still raw, but in this case we are not talking about 'giving back land' at all! We are talking about an individual giving over buildings/infrastructure/fixtures and fittings of a small but profitable camp having built a successful business, staying on to manage it in order to continue to attract overseas investment in the form of tourism - all of which goes directly back to the local community.
As far as I know (and do correct me if I am wrong, I may be way off the mark here) but the Namunyak/Mathews range area was not one that was colonised and farmed, so colonials have not 'profited' from or owned it in the past.
I also have to disagree with your point that the Samburu in this area were fine beforehand. Since the late 1970s/80s There's been a desperate need for infrastructure support for local communities since the land was ravaged by Somali poachers.
Since you said 'let's be real' and we are going into the topic of colonialism and landowning in Kenya, I'm going to dare to broach the thorny topic here.
I understand that it must be grating to see large scale (originally) foreign landowners still owning large tracts of Kenyan land, but the truth this situation has changed a lot since independence. The common perception is far different to the reality.
In fact, many formerly colonial owners sold their land to Kenyans at Independence and today the few that remain are aware of adverse public opinion, so are taking steps to respond to shifting times by creating conservancies whose profits go back to the community (see Lewa Wildlife Conservancy).
It's worth noting that today most large expanses of fertile land in Kenya are owned by Kenyan families with political connections. The largest landowners being Kenyattas/Mois/Kibakis etc.
There was a report on this entitled 'Who owns Kenya?' written on Feb 4th 2008 after the 2007 election crisis. It makes fascinating reading. It is estimated that the Kenyatta family alone own 500,000 acres (held in the names of various family members).
To quote the report;
"according to the Kenya Land Alliance, more than a half of the arable land in the country is in the hands of only 20% of the 30 million Kenyans. That has left up to 13% of the population absolutely landless while another 67% on average own less than an acre per person. The land crisis in the country will be difficult to solve because the most powerful people in the country are also among its biggest landowners."
I went back to reread your previous post and can't believe how far some of your readers took the argument. (Some people are much more 'vocal' when they're in front of a computer instead of facing a person.) Of course, each person is entitled to their own opinion and I'm so happy that you continue to voice yours.
ReplyDeleteTo Mrs Africa Expat Wife,
ReplyDeleteI am one of the Anon. persons who were irked (to put it lightly) and commented on your post on Sarara and the Kenyan MPs. I am glad that you have apologized for what I termed as degrading.
Ofcourse,there is "freedom of speech" but that doesn't include making others uncomfortable or inferior. Kenyans are hard working and they do not sit around waiting for hand-outs /charity .
All said and done ...your apology (eventhough long overdue) is the "bigger" thing to do. We are not savages in Kenya and respect of our country is imperative.
My advise to you is that you should be more meticulous about your facts and do not shy away from polite language and you shouldn't "jump the gun" when someone doesnt agree with you ...It is after all,a wonderful country ,this Kenya of ours...we are terribly proud of it..
Good luck with your writing,Mrs Africa Expat Wife..
Didn't really want to get into this but I thoiught I'd wade in about this common perception that Kenyan MP's never do anything for their communities. They are (some, anyway)corrupt, and selfish and i've criticised them heavily on this blog before but in their areas, especially rural MP's, they do do quite a lot for their communities...it just doesn't get reported on as much as their misdeeds. In fact, one of the arguments made for why they shouldn't pay taxes was that a huge proportion of their salaries go to their constituents anyway and I've actually seen that this is true in certain places (I still think they should pay taxes)
ReplyDeleteCheck out this link about Bifwoli, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYsCUnXZA_Y .
Reassured to hear from someone who commented above that I'd basically got the NRT/Namunyak structure right. It's quite complex and I worried that I might have got that wrong!
ReplyDeleteI also heard about Kenyan MPs who do a lot for their local communities. Will check out the link, many thanks!
I've been following this blog quietly for a year now and had to comment at this point.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry to have to say that I think that you are sometimes patronising. Unfortunately, I genuinely dont think you are aware of it. I'll tell you that very few, particularly in Western Africa would tolerate the negative excesses of foreign settlers. I often feel, on my visits to Nairobi that the Kenyan people are extremely welcoming and very accepting of foreigners living long term as part of their community and owning property here and there. I was shocked to see some of the treatment dished to local kenyans by the Asian settlers in particular! Its refreshing that expats seem to be more sympathetic to struggling locals but in the same breath many are very patronising from what I noticed.
Count yourself fortunate to live in Nairobi. Yes we are living in a global world where people are dotted everywhere however, as someone that has lived in Africa and also in London I am sure you know that you are extremely lucky to be living in Nairobi with maids and beautiful getaways at your feet as opposed to the UK in our terrible weather and miserable system. You should know that due to colonialism certain aspects of your blog (which I dont care to mention at the moment) would hit sore nerves for many. Please, have some respect for the kenyans by being super sensitive in your writing. If you cannot do this, then stop writing.
Sorry for the criticism but then again you should be able to handle it as a writer. You dont have to post this comment. Just a word of advise from me (and a group of other English expats here who have been reading your posts) to you. By the way I am a British lady, working in the Humanitarian field, also a mum of three and fortunate to have lived in eleven different countries across Africa including several visits to beautiful Kenya!
P.S. It's 'controversial' not 'contraversial'.
ReplyDeleteDiscovered your blog a couple of years ago, (The Times), I read it from time to time to see what's going on in Kenya, where I was born and raised, a few decades ago, left it 20 years ago. How things have changed, and how some things never do! I'm a bit late commenting on the "controversial" blog, as I just read it, but I can't help but say that I admire your courage and your spirit in defending your opinion, and your grace in doing so.
ReplyDeleteThe "indigineous" business. Complicated, in this day and age. We are fourth generation Kenyans, who came from the indian subcontinent. Does that make us indigineous? If not, why not? Do the Samburu think the wakamba are indigineous to their area?
Most of the " offence " taken by others is frankly nonsensical. And to one of the " Anonymous " fellows riled by your article, freedom of speech does sometimes offend or "make you feel inferior or uncomfortable". So be it. Otherwise it wouldn't be freedom, would it? Nowhere was the blog insulting, or disrespectful. And respect cannot be demanded, as some have suggested above. It is always earned.
Also, someone has very aptly suggested "wewe ni wetu". Your concern and your fondness for the country is always evident, and you write not exactly as an outsider, in fact, not at all.
I saw a movie on TV here in upstate New York the other day on George Adamson, and Tony Fitzjohn joining him at Kora. Richard Harris played Adamson. A bygone time, I thought, but it seems the place you wrote about in Sarara is somewhat similar.
As for the officials, etc., a pile of ivory was burnt the other day, with a fair amount of fanfare. I was working in Kenya the last time they did that, in '89, and I can't help but wonder again how much was not burnt, and instead saved for a rainy day!
So keep on blogging, and telling it like it is, including about the distribution of land. These matters, among many others, were not spoken about freely in the Kenya of the late 80's. You're doing a fine job, I for one enjoy your work. Thanks for letting me rant.
kenyan internet needs to improve for this to take off too..at the moment, wow to the mwananchi, who still needs to access application websites. You see safaricom is still a raw deal here guys reason being that, when internet has jumped a notch higher in demand for applications, take a look at the top kenyan marriage site, http://www.lovepot.com , and http://www.mapeni.com, people love it, but still who can afford computers and modems and airtime MBs.Tell those guys to simplify their site..oops..sorry guys. To Safaricom, god forbid, they should invent something new…that will reach all kenyans. Am writing this from the bush where i can heardly access 3g, and so heavy apps like nation newspapers dont load..hope soon they will do something smarter…they should hire me,,i have am idea
ReplyDeleteJambo. Habari? Kenya; I love it. Long term I'd love to move out to Kenya. I may even buy a small bit of land in Langa Langa, Gilgil (that's where a lot of my wafiki live). (Presently I live in Durham, England - my birth place.) I have never visted a country where everyone is so welcoming and friendly. The hospitality of Kenyans is beyond belief. Even those who have next to nothing will welcome you into their homes and look after you. I also know though that Kenya is a country of extremes. I have friends in the country who are far better off than I am in the U.K. but we also have friends (children and staff) who live in a Orphanage out in Dandora, a friend in Huruma, Nairobi and various government teacher friends in Central and the Rift Valley. I think that everyone should have the opportunity to visit Kenya to learn how we should support and care for each other. I think at heart Kenyan's are all really charitable (even with those who don't necessarily need it). I miss the place already (just flew home at the end of last month).
ReplyDeleteThe Kenyans I stay with on the whole complain about their MPs and how corrupt they are. (I'm sure ours back home are just as bad.) I do know a few projects funded by past MPs. The childrens home I stay at was set up by one of the MPs killed in the post election violence. Unfortunately it now has very little support - luckily a kind Dandora resident has given the a place to stay rent free as a temporary measure until their long term future can be sorted out. I've also seen various positive CDF projects but I'm not entirely sure where the funding from those comes from - though I assume that MPs are involved in some way. The school I volunteered at (teaching physics and biology) has benefited from the fund who have provided two science labs and two more class rooms.
Staying in Langa Langa, Gilgil I also get some insight in to black Kenyan's views on expats. (There is a large number nearby.) Whilst they complement a lot of them on doing a lot of positive work for the local community (charitable projects involving building new schools, etc...) they see a number of the ex-pats as a bit aloof. I'm accepted so well around Langa Langa (often seen as a bit of a dangerous area by other mzungu) because I mix with the locals and treat them as equals. Last year I even purchased a goat to take to one elderly woman (who only speaks Kikuyu but I dearly love - we are always welcomed (literally) with open arms).
That doesn't mean that I don't occasionally complain about the way Kenyans do things. I'll complain about Kenyan time quite frequently. Also Ugali for 3 out of my last 4 meals was pushing it a bit! (I can eat it but still at a loss to why Kenyan's love it so much.)
I'm not sure I've really said anything I set out to in this post. I hope I won't have offended anyone with my comments. Kenya is a lovely country and I can't wait to come back. One of my teachers friends eldest daughters told me to run away and hide so I didn't have to come home to England. I'm not sure they yet realise how happily I'd stay in the country. Asante Sana Kenya.
Mrs Woodhams,
ReplyDeleteYour blog was a lucky find on the internet. I see that you have written for the times as well. I love your posts as they keep me informed on whats going on in Kenya. I currently live in London but hope to move there soon. Please keep writing. Its great to see that negative comments haven't put you off!
Sarara Camp post Awesome Blog. I enjoyed reading your posts. This is truly a great read for me about My Sarara Camp post elicited a slew of racially motivated comments . I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete